新参者
奔驰“天价”补偿鼓励员工离职,此计划不涉及中国市场_我的网站

A |

West Kowloon Law Courts Building in Hong Kong Photo: VCG
The anti-China group "Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China", along with its former chairman and vice-chairpersons Lee Cheuk-yan, Albert Ho Chun-yan and Chow Hang-tung, were charged with inciting others to subvert state power and have been remanded in custody since then. The local court in Hong Kong found two defendants guilty on Friday, and Ho pleaded guilty before the trial began, local media reported.
The central government's office for safeguarding national security in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) voiced support for the court's lawful prosecution on Friday, saying that the verdict demonstrates the spirit of the rule of law and upholds the authority of the National Security Law (NSL) for Hong Kong.
The HKSAR government also welcomed the court's guilty verdict. HKSAR Chief Executive John Lee Ka-chiu said that for a long time, the Hong Kong Alliance had deliberately sown seeds of hatred toward the Communist Party of China (CPC) and the central government in Hong Kong society. Through various means, it sought to incite feelings of dislike and hatred toward the CPC and the central government among members of the public, and to encourage the public to subvert state power, RTHK reported.
The defendants' long-standing conduct endangered national security, and their plot was plainly evident and had to be punished, Lee said.
Inciting subversion of state power is an extremely serious offense, he said. The HKSAR government has a responsibility to safeguard national security and will resolutely prevent, stop and punish acts and activities that endanger national security, Lee noted.
In this case, the local court in Hong Kong clearly set out how Hong Kong courts understand and apply the provisions of the Chinese Constitution. The ruling will also serve as a legal principle and precedent, providing an important reference for future cases. It is consistent with legal principles and carries legal force, some legal experts said.
Looking back at the case, the prosecution and defense engaged in intense legal arguments over the boundaries between freedom of expression and national security, with the core dispute going to the constitutional and legal limits under the "One Country, Two Systems" framework, Willy Fu, a law professor who is also the director of the Chinese Association of Hong Kong & Macao Studies, told the Global Times on Friday.
In its closing submissions, the prosecution argued that the defendants' long-standing slogan of "ending one-party rule" was not merely a political advocacy campaign, but was essentially aimed at rejecting the leadership of the CPC and attempting to subvert the fundamental system of the state, Fu continued.
Such conduct, the prosecution argued, went far beyond the scope of freedom of expression protected by the Basic Law and the NSL for Hong Kong, and constituted an objective act of inciting subversion of state power through "unlawful means," Fu said.
In this case, the local court in Hong Kong clearly set out the Hong Kong courts' understanding and application of the provisions of the Chinese Constitution. The ruling will also serve as a legal principle and precedent, providing an important reference for future cases. It is consistent with legal principles and carries legal force, Chu Kar-kin, a veteran commentator based in the HKSAR and member of the Chinese Association of Hong Kong and Macao Studies, told the Global Times on Friday.
Hong Kong judges likewise need to receive comprehensive and systematic education on China's national Constitution, Chu said.
The Constitution is the fundamental law of the state and the most important component of the constitutional order of the HKSAR. The core of the constitutional order of the state is the establishment of the CPC's position as the governing party. The Preamble to the Constitution makes it clear that the leadership by the CPC is the core and foundation of the constitutional order of the PRC, a spokesperson from the HKSAR government said on Friday.
The HKSAR is an inalienable part of the PRC. The state provides the fundamental guarantee for the prosperity and development of Hong Kong, and the highest principle of "One Country, Two Systems" is to safeguard national sovereignty, security and development interests, the spokesperson said.
The HKSAR Government will resolutely safeguard the fundamental system of the state established by the Constitution and the security of state power, and will, in strict accordance with the principle of the rule of law, prevent, suppress and punish acts and activities endangering national security with full force and in accordance with the law, the spokesperson added.
。

B | 本文来自微信公众号: 经济观察报 (ID:eeo-com-cn),作者:周菊,题图来自:AI生成
近日,梅赛德斯-奔驰(以下简称“奔驰”)“大裁员”消息引发业内高度关注,其范围之广、赔偿之高成为热议焦点。有消息称,奔驰正推行有史以来规模最大的裁员计划,截至目前,约4000名员工已接受遣散方案离职。

C | 补偿金额度采用梯度设计,与职级、工龄紧密挂钩,还特别设置“加速奖金”激励员工尽早决策,最高赔偿可达“N+11”,资深管理人员最高可获50万欧元(约合人民币410万元)补偿金。

D | 不过据了解,此项计划和中国市场无关。

E |
今年以来,奔驰持续进行产能、供应链及人员的优化与调整。

F | 早在今年3月,就有消息传出,奔驰管理层将于4月向全体员工发信,鼓励员工自愿离职。

G | 遣散费方案主要面向工程师、行政及IT领域员工,感兴趣的员工可在2026年3月前进行申请。
据相关报道,奔驰首席执行官奥拉・卡列尼乌斯(Ola Källenius)表示,希望优厚的离职补偿能鼓励约3万名员工自愿离职。官方期望到2027年,通过外包决策、不填补空缺职位以及遣散费等措施,每年节省约50亿欧元。

H |
2025年上半年,受行业转型深入、市场竞争加剧、关税等因素叠加影响,通用、福特、大众、奔驰、宝马、stellantis、丰田等多家跨国车企巨头,普遍出现业绩波动,这是促使它们进行“瘦身”的直接原因。数据显示,2025年上半年,奔驰净利润下滑55.8%。

I |
在“瘦身”的同时,奔驰也在加速电动化和数字化转型,以把握未来机遇。8月曝光的一份奔驰投资者文件显示,奔驰计划在未来两年内推出一系列新车型,覆盖从入门级到高端市场的所有细分领域。

J | 尤其在中国市场,奔驰在2024年业绩说明会上表示,2025年至2027年将推出多款专属产品,覆盖所有细分市场和驱动形式。这些为中国市场量身打造的产品将在本土研发,并搭载中国特有的应用程序和车机内容,包括专属智能座舱和智能驾驶功能。目前,奔驰已与Momenta等本土智能驾驶供应商达成战略合作。
事实上,受市场份额下滑以及关税等因素影响,德国汽车行业正掀起“裁员潮”,奔驰并非个例。大众汽车集团去年底与德国工会达成协议,计划到2030年在德国裁员超过3.5万人,并削减德国工厂产能,希望到2030年每年节省15亿欧元劳动力成本。

K | 今年9月,德国汽车零部件供应商博世宣布,到2030年底将进一步削减约1.3万个岗位,主要集中在汽车零部件业务部门;采埃孚在10月初表示,2030年前将裁减动力总成部门约7600个工作岗位。
Current article:http://kzno.maqiwenghepinyonghunpeng.cyou/news/20260826_119579.html
Published on:08:19:07